Выпуск №10 (Июль)
V Международная научная конференция "Science and Global Studies", 30 декабря 2020 (Прага, Чехия)

V Международная научная конференция «Научные исследования: парадигма инновационного развития» (Прага, Чехия), «28» декабря 2020 года

IV Международная научная конференция "Science and Global Studies", 30 ноября 2020 (Прага, Чехия)

IV Международная научная конференция «Научные исследования: парадигма инновационного развития» (Прага, Чехия), «27» ноября 2020 года

ІІІ Международная научная конференция "Science and Global Studies", 30 октября 2020 (г. Прага, Чехия)

ІIІ Международная научная конференция «Научные исследования: парадигма инновационного развития» (Братислава - Вена), «26» мая 2020 года

ІІ Международная научная конференция «Научные исследования: парадигма инновационного развития» (Братислава - Вена), «27» апреля 2020 года

Science and Global Studies, 31 марта 2020 (г. Братислава, Словакия)

Международная научная конференция «Научные исследования: парадигма инновационного развития» (Братислава - Вена), «25» марта 2020 года

Science and Global Studies, 30 декабря 2019 (г. Братислава, Словакия)

XLV Международная научно-практическая конференция «Актуальные проблемы современной науки», 28.11.2019 (Совместная конференция с Международным научным центром развития науки и технологий)

XLIV Международная научно-практическая конференция «Актуальные проблемы современной науки», 30.10.2019 (Совместная конференция с Международным научным центром развития науки и технологий)

XLIІI Международная научно-практическая конференция «Актуальные проблемы современной науки», 29.08.2019 (Совместная конференция с Международным научным центром развития науки и технологий)

XLIІI Международная научно-практическая конференция «Актуальные проблемы современной науки», 30.07.2019 (Совместная конференция с Международным научным центром развития науки и технологий)

XLII Международная научно-практическая конференция «Актуальные проблемы современной науки», 27.06.2019 (Совместная конференция с Международным научным центром развития науки и технологий)

XLI Международная научно-практическая конференция «Актуальные проблемы современной науки», 30.05.2019 (Совместная конференция с Международным научным центром развития науки и технологий)

XL Международная научно-практическая конференция «Актуальные проблемы современной науки», 28.03.2019 (Совместная конференция с Международным научным центром развития науки и технологий)

МНПК "Цифровая трансформация и инновации в экономике, праве, государственном управлении, науке и образовательных процессах", 18-21.03.2019

XXXIX Международная научно-практическая конференция «Актуальные проблемы современной науки», 27.02.2019 (Совместная конференция с Международным научным центром развития науки и технологий)

XIII Международная научно-практическая конференция «Научный диспут: вопросы экономики и финансов», 31.01.2019 (Совместная конференция с Финансово-экономическим научным советом)

XXXVIII Международная научно-практическая конференция «Актуальные проблемы современной науки», 30.01.2019 (Совместная конференция с Международным научным центром развития науки и технологий)

XXXVІI Международная научно-практическая конференция: "Актуальные проблемы современной науки", 28.12.2018 (Совместная конференция с Международным научным центром)

XXXVI Международная научно-практическая конференция: "Актуальные проблемы современной науки", 29.11.2018 (Совместная конференция с Международным научным центром)

XIII Международная научно-практическая конференция «Актуальные проблемы экономики и финансов», 31.10.2018 (Совместная конференция с Финансово-экономическим научным советом)

XXXV Международная научно-практическая конференция: "Актуальные проблемы современной науки", 30.10.2018 (Совместная конференция с Международным научным центром)

XXXIV Международная научно-практическая конференция: "Актуальные проблемы современной науки", 28.09.2018 (Совместная конференция с Международным научным центром)

ХXXIII Международная научно-практическая конференция: "Актуальные проблемы современной науки", 30.08.2018 (Совместная конференция с Международным научным центром)

ХXXII Международная научно-практическая конференция: "Актуальные проблемы современной науки", 31.07.2018 (Совместная конференция с Международным научным центром)

XII Международная научно-практическая конференция «Актуальные проблемы экономики и финансов», 31.07.2018 (Совместная конференция с Финансово-экономическим научным советом)

ХXXI Международная научно-практическая конференция: "Актуальные проблемы современной науки", 29.06.2018 (Совместная конференция с Международным научным центром)

ХІ Международная научно-практическая конференция «Глобальные проблемы экономики и финансов», 31.05.2018 (Совместная конференция с Финансово-экономическим научным советом)

XXХ Международная научно-практическая конференция: "Актуальные проблемы современной науки", 30.05.2018 (Совместная конференция с Международным научным центром)

XXIХ Международная научно-практическая конференция: "Актуальные проблемы современной науки", 30.04.2018 (Совместная конференция с Международным научным центром)

ХХVIІІ Международная научно-практическая конференция: "Актуальные проблемы современной науки", 29.03.2018 (Совместная конференция с Международным научным центром)

ІІІ МНПК "Экономика, финансы и управление в XXI веке: анализ тенденций и перспективы развития", 19-22.03.2018 (Совместная конференция с Финансово-экономическим научным советом)

X Международная научно-практическая конференция «Глобальные проблемы экономики и финансов», 28.02.2018 (Совместная конференция с Финансово-экономическим научным советом)

ХХVІІ Международная научно-практическая конференция: "Актуальные проблемы современной науки", 27.02.2018 (Совместная конференция с Международным научным центром)

ХХVІ Международная научно-практическая конференция: "Актуальные проблемы современной науки", 30.01.2018 (Совместная конференция с Международным научным центром)

XІІ Международная научно-практическая конференция «Научный диспут: вопросы экономики и финансов», 29.12.2017 (Совместная конференция с Финансово-экономическим научным советом)

ХХV Международная научно-практическая конференция: "Актуальные проблемы современной науки", 28.12.2017 (Совместная конференция с Международным научным центром)

ХХІV Международная научно-практическая конференция: "Актуальные проблемы современной науки", 29.11.2017 (Совместная конференция с Международным научным центром)

XI Международная научно-практическая конференция «Актуальные проблемы экономики и финансов», 31.10.2017 (Совместная конференция с Финансово-экономическим научным советом)

XІ Международная научно-практическая конференция «Научный диспут: вопросы экономики и финансов», 29.09.2017 (Совместная конференция с Финансово-экономическим научным советом)

ХХIІІ Международная научно-практическая конференция: "Актуальные проблемы современной науки", 28.09.2017 (Совместная конференция с Международным научным центром)

X Международная научно-практическая конференция «Актуальные проблемы экономики и финансов», 31.07.2017 (Совместная конференция с Финансово-экономическим научным советом)

ХXII Международная научно-практическая конференция: "Актуальные проблемы современной науки", 28.07.2017 (Совместная конференция с Международным научным центром)

ХXI Международная научно-практическая конференция: "Актуальные проблемы современной науки", 29.06.2017 (Совместная конференция с Международным научным центром)

IX Международная научно-практическая конференция «Глобальные проблемы экономики и финансов», 31.05.2017 (Совместная конференция с Финансово-экономическим научным советом)

ХX Международная научно-практическая конференция: "Актуальные проблемы современной науки", 30.05.2017 (Совместная конференция с Международным научным центром)

"Тенденции развития национальных экономик: экономическое и правовое измерение" 18-19.05.2017 (Совместная конференция с Финансово-экономическим научным советом и ККИБиП)

ХIX Международная научно-практическая конференция: "Актуальные проблемы современной науки", 27.04.2017 (Совместная конференция с Международным научным центром)

IX Международная научно-практическая конференция "Научный диспут: вопросы экономики и финансов", 31.03.2017 (Совместная конференция с Финансово-экономическим научным советом)

ХVIII Международная научно-практическая конференция: "Актуальные проблемы современной науки", 30.03.2017 (Совместная конференция с Международным научным центром)

МНПК "Экономика, финансы и управление в XXI веке: анализ тенденций и перспективы развития", 20–23.03.2017 (Совместная конференция с Финансово-экономическим научным советом)

VIII Международная научно-практическая конференция "Глобальные проблемы экономики и финансов", 28.02.2017 (Совместная конференция с Финансово-экономическим научным советом)

ХVII Международная научно-практическая конференция: "Актуальные проблемы современной науки", 27.02.2017 (Совместная конференция с Международным научным центром)

VIII Международная научно-практическая конференция "Актуальные проблемы экономики и финансов", 31.01.2017 (Совместная конференция с Финансово-экономическим научным советом)

ХVI Международная научно-практическая конференция: "Актуальные проблемы современной науки", 30.01.2017 (Совместная конференция с Международным научным центром)

ХV Международная научно-практическая конференция: "Актуальные проблемы современной науки", 28.12.2016 (Совместная конференция с Международным научным центром)

VIII Международная научно-практическая конференция "Научный диспут: вопросы экономики и финансов", 28.12.2016 (Совместная конференция с Финансово-экономическим научным советом)

VII Международная научно-практическая конференция "Глобальные проблемы экономики и финансов", 30.11.2016 (Совместная конференция с Финансово-экономическим научным советом)

ХІV Международная научно-практическая конференция: "Актуальные проблемы современной науки", 29.11.2016 (Совместная конференция с Международным научным центром)

VII Международная научно-практическая конференция "Актуальные проблемы экономики и финансов", 31.10.2016 (Совместная конференция с Финансово-экономическим научным советом)

ХІІІ Международная научно-практическая конференция: "Актуальные проблемы современной науки", 28.10.2016 (Совместная конференция с Международным научным центром)

VII Международная научно-практическая конф. «Научный диспут: вопросы экономики и финансов», 30.09.2016 (Совместная конференция с Финансово-экономическим научным советом)

ХІІ Международная научно-практическая конференция: "Актуальные проблемы современной науки", 29.09.2016 (Совместная конференция с Международным научным центром)

XI Международная научно-практическая конференция «Актуальные проблемы современной науки», 30.08.2016 (Совместная конференция с Международным научным центром)

ІV Международная научно-практическая конф. "Экономика и управление в XXI веке: анализ тенденций и перспектив развития", 29.07.2016 (Совместная конференция с Финансово-экономическим научным советом)

X Международная научно-практическая конференция "Актуальные проблемы современной науки", 28.07.2016 (Совместная конференция с Международным научным центром)

VІ Международная научно-практическая конференция "Актуальные проблемы экономики и финансов", 30.06.2016 (Совместная конференция с Финансово-экономическим научным советом)

ІX Международная научно-практическая конференция "Актуальные проблемы современной науки", 29.06.2016 (Совместная конференция с Международным научным центром)

VI Международная научно-практическая конференция "Научный диспут: вопросы экономики и финансов", 31.05.2016 (Совместная конференция с Финансово-экономическим научным советом)

VIIІ Международная научно-практическая конференция "Актуальные проблемы современной науки", 30.05.2016 (Совместная конференция с Международным научным центром)

V Международная научно-практическая конференция "Глобальные проблемы экономики и финансов", 29.04.2016 (Совместная конференция с Финансово-экономическим научным советом)

VIІ Международная научно-практическая конференция "Актуальные проблемы современной науки", 28.04.2016 (Совместная конференция с Международным научным центром)

VІ Международная научно-практическая конференция "Актуальные проблемы современной науки", 31.03.2016 (Совместная конференция с Международным научным центром)

ІI Международная научно-практическая конф. "Экономика и управление в XXI веке: анализ тенденций и перспектив развития", 30.03.2016 (Совместная конференция с Финансово-экономическим научным советом)

V Международная научно-практическая конференция "Актуальные проблемы экономики и финансов", 21-24.03.2016 (Совместная конференция с Финансово-экономическим научным советом)

V Международная научно-практическая конференция "Научный диспут: вопросы экономики и финансов", 26.02.2016 (Совместная конференция с Финансово-экономическим научным советом)

II Международная научно-практическая конференция: "Научный диспут: актуальные вопросы медицины" 20.02.2016 (Совместная конференция с Международным научным центром)

ІV Международная научно-практическая конференция "Актуальные проблемы современной науки", 29.12.2015 (Совместная конференция с Международным научным центром)

IV Международная научно-практическая конференция "Глобальные проблемы экономики и финансов", 28.12.2015 (Совместная конференция с Финансово-экономическим научным советом)

IV Международная научно-практическая конференция "Актуальные проблемы экономики и финансов", 30.11.2015 (Совместная конференция с Финансово-экономическим научным советом)

IV Международная научно-практическая конференция "Научный диспут: вопросы экономики и финансов", 29.10.2015 (Совместная конференция с Финансово-экономическим научным советом)

Международная научно-практическая конференция: "Научный диспут: актуальные вопросы медицины" 28.10.2015 (Совместная конференция с Международным научным центром)

III Международная научно-практическая конференция "Глобальные проблемы экономики и финансов", 30.09.2015 (Совместная конференция с Финансово-экономическим научным советом)

III Международная научно-практическая конференция "Актуальные проблемы экономики и финансов", 31.08.2015 (Совместная конференция с Финансово-экономическим научным советом)

ІІІ Международная научно-практическая конференция "Научный диспут: вопросы экономики и финансов", 30.06.2015 (Совместная конференция с Финансово-экономическим научным советом)

ІІ Международная научно-практическая конференция "Актуальные проблемы современной науки", 29.06.2015 (Совместная конференция с Международным научным центром)

II Международная научно-практическая конференция "Глобальные проблемы экономики и финансов", 28.05.2015 (Совместная конференция с Финансово-экономическим научным советом)

Актуальные проблемы экономики и финансов, 29.04.2015 (Совместная конференция с Финансово-экономическим научным советом)

Научный диспут: вопросы экономики и финансов, 31.03.2015 (Совместная конференция с Финансово-экономическим научным советом)

Актуальные проблемы современной науки, 27.03.2015 (Совместная конференция с Международным научным центром)

Глобальные проблемы экономики и финансов, 27.02.2015 (Совместная конференция с финансово-экономическим научным советом)



Banabakova V. K., Georgiev M. P. Building competencies for social work through continuing vocational training // International scientific journal "Internauka". - 2017. - №10.


Отрасль науки: Экономические науки
Скачать статью (pdf)

УДК 331

Banabakova V. K.

Professor, Ph.D.

National Military University

Veliko Tarnovo, Bulgaria

Georgiev M. P.

Ph.D. student

National Military University

Veliko Tarnovo, Bulgariа

BUILDING COMPETENCIES FOR SOCIAL WORK THROUGH CONTINUING VOCATIONAL TRAINING

Summary: The occupation of the social worker in modern times is challenged by the dynamically changing economic and social environment, growing requirements to their qulifications and competences and the needs of gaining new skills and permanen development and improvement. The aim of the presented study of defining the needs for continuing vocational training of specialists providing social services is to provide recommendations regarding the need of training for skills contributing to the increase in the degree of correspondence between labor supply and demand on the labor market, contributing to the improvement of the quality of the labor force in the country as a competitive factor with an increasing importance for successful economic development. The investigation and the specific examples discussed can be a solid basis for future studies and development of models for improvement the system of continuing and vocational training for acquiring the needed knowledge, skills and competences for effective work.

Key words: continuing training, vocational training, social worker, labor market.

INTRODUCTION

For two decades in Bulgaria now there has been conducted a reform in the field of vocational education and training provision in line with the changing needs of the labor market. Support has been provided by a number of programs and projects that assist a platform for continued reform aiming at turning strategic planning into a practical reality [1].

The philosophy of labor market communication, understood in some countries in a slightly narrower sense as social dialogue, is at the heart of building the system of research, identification and monitoring of vocational training needs. The effectiveness of the functioning of a communication system depends exclusively on the political will and the political attitude of communication of all stakeholders. With the availability of appropriate legislation and qualified and motivated experts and employees in the institutions that play key roles in the system, the set of the above two attitudes will make a positive contribution to the country's development [2,3].

Labor market analysis in Bulgaria highlights significant communication deficits, both between individual public institutions and between institutions on the one hand, and employers and employees, on the other [1]. Regarding the general situation on the labor market in Bulgaria and the state of vocational education and training, the representatives of the institutions of employment and social policy unanimously stress the need for radical changes in the cooperation between the labor market partners but also in the content of work, such as quality control of education and training services, collection and analysis of information on the needs of employers by qualified staff, accordance of education and training to employers' needs and others.

The systematic labor market communication requires equal and equally responsible participation of all labor market partners regardless of whether they are government structures or representatives of employers, employees, vocational training centers, regional and municipal administrations, non-governmental organizations and other. This way, each partner can get credible information if it has previously provided reliable information to other partners.

All studies that aim to make forecasts for skills and skill needs are characterized by some uncertainty about the expected results and expected effects. The introduction of a future-oriented labor market development system that includes skills needs analysis is a good step. But in reality it is not enough. Such a system can be useful only if it is part of a wider system. Broader systems provide information and professional communication among all stakeholders in the socio-economic sphere.

The expectation is that organizations in Bulgaria will increasingly focus in the future on the quality and improvement of the skills of their workforce [4,5]. The acute shortage of qualified workers and employees is also present in many of the economic sectors in the country, so the skills needs analyses will support the management and entrepreneurial decisions in the Bulgarian organizations. To achieve this, an organized mechanism should be set up to connect ministries, government agencies, social partners, employment services - private or government, chambers of commerce, vocational education and training institutions, employers 'organizations and employees' organizations. This organized mechanism should work by carrying out in sequence, in a certain order and without interruption, a series of research and analytical steps, as well as those related to the dissemination of information and the provision of continuous feedback.

The aim of the presented study of defining the needs for continuing vocational training of specialists providing social services is to increase the degree of correspondence between labor supply and demand on the labor market, contributing to the improvement of the quality of the labor force in the country as a competitive factor with an increasing importance for successful economic development.

In this sense, a realistic planning of human resources based on systematic monitoring and knowledge of the workforce must be achieved. The database collected must support the decision-making process in the areas of employment, labor market, vocational education and training, higher education, and the development of the workforce at national and regional level [6]. In this context, the tasks of determining the needs for continuing vocational training of social work professionals are the following [7-16]:

  • Systematic analysis of the labor market;
  • Systematic study and analysis of skills needs;
  • Support the process of developing and permanently updating professional standards (in line with international standards) by providing systematic information for decision-making in this area;
  • Support the process of developing and permanently updating educational standards by providing systematic information on decision-making in this field;
  • Support the process of developing and permanently updating educational programs by providing systematic information on decision-making in this field;
  • Development of curricula for vocational education and training (especially for adults);
  • Development of training modules.

The study and determination of the need for continuing vocational training of social work professionals providing social services is seen as a process that goes from the labor market analysis, through the next steps to the development of curricula, programs and modules, and through the feedback again and continuously passes through the series of steps [17-21].

The aim of the study of the needs of continuing vocational training in the Child Protection and Disability and Social Services Departments of the Social Assistance Directorates of the Social Assistance Agency in Bulgaria to improve the quality and effectiveness of social work is to define the needs of adequate training and measures to support social workers in order to achieve greater efficiency in social work in the context of lifelong learning and continuing vocational training. The aim of the study of the needs for continuing vocational training is also the identification of acceptable options for providing continuous training and upgrading adequate training of the employees to increase their qualification for working with different groups of clients. The main expected result of the analysis of the study is to ouline the basic needs for continuing vocational training for the employees of the two departments. For the sake of maximal accuracy, the survey is also aimed at examining the views of directors, heads of departments and chief experts in the Child Protection and Disability and Social Services Departments of the Social Assistance Directorates [22-45].

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The research tools in studing the needs of continuing vocational training in the Child Protection and Disability and Social Services Departments of the Social Assistance Directorates of the Social Assistance Agency for improving the quality and effectiveness of social work use information by the following sources:

  • Specialized questionnaires for employees in the Child Protection and Disability and Social Services Departments of the Social Assistance Directorates.
  • Specialized questionnaires for directors of directorates, heads of departments and chief experts in the Child Protection and Disability and Social Services Departments of the Social Assistance Directorates.

Questionnaires are a tool for achieving three major goals:

  1. Gathering information on the specific training and qualification needs of employees;
  2. Identification and prioritization of specific training needs and topics;

3.Defining the target groups, types and forms of training that employees of Child Protection and People with Disabilities and Social Services need in the Social Assistance Directorates and directors of directorates, heads of department and chief experts in Child Protection and People with Disabilities and Social Services Divisions at the Social Assistance Directorates.

The target group is generally defined - employees of the Child Protection and Disability and Social Services Departments of the Social Assistance Directorates, the interviewing of which will enable the process of identifying the needs for continuing vocational training to be completed.

For the purposes of the study of the needs of continuing vocational training in the Departments Child Protection and People with Disabilities and Social Services an instruction is developed for carrying out the research, which shows the steps and important moments in the immediate gathering of information by completing the questionnaires. The instruction contains the basic requirements and is a reference in the process of collecting information such as:

  • How the survey is presented, what are its objectives, the person who realizes it;
  • How to identify the employees to be surveyed;
  • Requirements for strictness of information, accuracy of filling;
  • Special issues and requirements for them;
  • Deadline for submitting filled-in questionnaires and exact sending address.

For each of the target groups (employees of the Child Protection and Disability and Social Services Departments of the Social Assistance Directorates and directors of directorates, heads of department and chief experts in Child Protection Departments and People with Disabilities and Social Services), individual questionnaires were developed. The questionnaire for employees of the Child Protection and Disability and Social Services Departments of the Social Assistance Directorates is anonymous in order to obtain reliable information.

In the questionnaire for the employees of the Departments of Child Protection and People with Disabilities and Social Services in the Social Assistance Directorates the issues are divided into three sections:

Section I. General profile of surveyed employees - includes issues related to gender, age, completed final education, completed final qualification, current job position and social work experience. Questions are common to both departments.

Section II. The level of competence of experts and social workers is divided into two parts common to both departments.

Part A. Knowledge of social work of the interviewed employees - questions are included to determine whether the acquired knowledge about social work (formal and informal) helps social workers to carry out activities such as informing, actively listening, assessing the needs of the clients, maintaining positive work Customer relations, preparation of individual plans for working with clients, planning and managing the intervention, setting priorities in the work.

Part B. Social Work Skills for Responding Employees - Are issues to determine the social work skills acquired by social workers, such as taking into account different points of view in collecting information, establishing effective contact with people, planning the actions to achieve the Purpose, creating working relationships, maintaining positive working relationships, applying the ethical principles of social work, recognizing risk situations, analyzing risk and potential time For both yourself and others, job satisfaction.

Section III. Need for training and career development of respondents. The section includes different questions for the two departments, with the aim of maximizing accuracy in determining the need for adequate training, such as introductory trainings, types of trainings, upgrading trainings, time and place, duration, professional and career development, different areas needed super vision.

The purpose of the questionnaire for directors of directorates, heads of unit and chief experts in the Child Protection and Disability and Social Services Departments of the Social Assistance Directorates is to determine the level of competence of employees in the Protection Departments Child and Disabled and Social Services  through “managers' eyes”. It contains two sections:

Section I. Direct supervisor interview - includes issues related to the review of the overall operational work, such as daily tasks, responsibilities, job requirements, effective communication with clients and colleagues, degree of satisfaction, signs of insufficient motivation of the teams.

Section II. Level of competencies of the employees in the Child Protection and Disability and Social Services Departments in the Social Assistance Directorates assessed by the managers - these include issues to determine attitudes towards positive communication in the work with clients, skills Teamwork and experience sharing, work with documentation on social services, skills for working with difficult or disadvantaged clients, attitudes to self-assessment of own qualities and deficits, the need for additional vocational training and super vision by species.

The processing of information gathered from questionnaires is conducted through the following procedural steps:

  • Preparing a matrix of entering information.
  • Introduction of the information or the conversion of the information collected in numerical order, which is suitable subsequently for quantitative processing; entering the numeric values that correspond to each of the options provided in the questionnaire; Depending on the type of question for each variable, a different number of responses and their corresponding numeric expressions are possible.
  • Statictical processing - in this case are suitable one-dimensional and two-dimensional distributions, medium arithmetic, median and mode, tests for static significance and hypothesis testing.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

The questionnaire intended for employees of the Child Protection Departments was organized to fill in a paper format of 23 pages. 767 respondents completed and returned it, with 468 respondents answering all questionnaires.

The questionnaire contained a total of 76 questions divided by sections. 11 are the questions requiring general information, 62 have the choice of just one answer, 3 with the choice of more than one answer, 2 are open questions and 1 question of prioritizing and mentioning more than one answer.

Regarding the distribution of the respondents by sex the share of social workers - women is the highest - 90,6% of the total number.

48,5% of respondents are aged 36-55 years, 33,8% are 26-35 years old and only 12,1% up to 25 years. (Table 1).

On the question of the type of completed education, 85,9% answered higher education, of which 51,0% hold a Master's degree and 34,9% have a Bachelor's degree. Secondary education workers account for a total of 13,8% (Table 2).

Interesting information provides the question "Year of completion of the last education". As can be seen from Table 4, the number of graduates has increased since 1995 – 2,2%, 2000 – 5,4%, 2005 – 5,9%, 2011 – 8,2% compared to 1972 – 0,4%, 1977 – 0,5%, 1982 – 0,7%, 1990 – 0,8%.

Interesting information provides the question "Year of completion of the last education". The number of graduates has increased since 1995 – 2,2%, 2000 – 5,4%, 2005 – 5,9%, 2011 – 8,2% compared to 1972 – 0,4%, 1977 – 0,5%, 1982 – 0,7%, 1990 – 0,8%.

Of all the employees, 36.9% graduated from the professional field "Social activities", while 63,1% - specialties from other professional fields. (Table 3).

On the question about last qualification 49,3% of the respondents indicated a key competence / certification course and 41,9% - professional qualification. The percentage of respondents to this question is 43,9% (Table 4).

Table 1. Age characteristics of participants in the survey

Table 2. Educational characteristics of participants in the survey

Table 3. Information about the professional fields and specialties

Table 4. Information on the last acquired qualification

Table 5. Distribution of interviewees by length of service

The distribution of interviewed employees by internship in the social sphere is presented in Table 5, which shows that the highest percentage of 42,4% is for employees with a work experience of up to 2 years and only 4,6% for those with experience over 20 years. 1,7% of respondents did not respond.
The question "Before you start working on a specific case you get to know the information available" 694 respondents answered „always detailed“, which accounts for 91%. A negative "always missing information" response was 2,2%. Four did not respond.

To obtain additional information that can be useful in establishing initial contact, 53,7% of respondents have indicated „always“ and 39,3% - „connect if necessary“ - an indicative result for good teamwork and quality work.

To the question „Evaluate all available information to determine the best form to establish primary contact“ 83,6% of social workers responded „always in detail“ and only 4,9% said „do not make judgments, go to work“.

Informing the clients about their rights, opportunities and responsibilities is done according to 93,4% „always, in detail“, 4,7% have indicated „always but in part“, „I inform them when they ask me“ – 1,7% of respondents, and 0,1% does not inform them. Five employees did not answer the question.

Explanations of the duties and responsibilities of the social workers, as well as those of the unit in which they work, are „always, in detail“ - 72,8%, „always but in part“ – 17,9%, „Explain when asked“ – 8,5% and „Do not explain“ - only 0,8% of the respondents.

In the questions of indicating the client's help to understand the information related to the case, to express expectations, to make an informed decision 85,5% of the respondents answered „always, in detail“, „do not help“ have indicated only 0,5% of respondents.

On the question „Are you actively listening to your customers“ 95,9% answered „always with details“, „always, but in part“ – 4,1%. Two employees did not respond, and the answers "do not listen because I do not care" and "do not listen because I do not have enough time" were not mentioned.

When assessing the needs of the clients 88,1% of the social workers take into account their specificities, the existing risks and opportunities as „always, in detail“. 6,9% of respondents consider „always, but in part“, 2,9% comply with normative documents only and only 2,1% said „I can not take everything“. Two of the social workers did not answer.

Despite the busy workday 78,4% of the social workers maintain a positive working relationship with the client „always“ and 20,2% answererd that „not always, it  depends on the client“. A positive attitude of mood for the day was determined by 1,1% of social workers, and two employees never support this attitude. The results are presented in Table. 6.

The preparation of individual customer service plans is „always“ performed by 72,8% of the surveyed social workers. Response „always, not very detailed“ indicated 15,3% of the respondents, and 8,8% of them – „I always borrow from others like this“. Only 2,3% did not produce individual plans, and 16 employees did not answer this question. The results are presented in Table 7.

Collaboration with colleagues and other professionals at work is supported by 98,7% of respondents, and only 1,3% of them have mistrust their colleagues' competence and have marked a „do not discuss because they are not so competent“.

Table 6. Status of work relationships

Table 7. Individual plans for work with clients

With behavior that represents a risk in the work of a social worker 40,1% of respondents do not have difficulties, and 48,7% of them face „not very serious difficulties“. Serious difficulties are experienced by 9,5% of the employees, with very serious difficulties and unable to cope with - 1,8%.
The question „You are able to plan and manage the intervention in a way that will positively change the recognized risk behavior“ 84,3% of the respondents are dealing without difficulty and with not very serious difficulties. Serious difficulties in planning and managing intervention were mentioned by 14,3%, and 1,4% of social workers are unable to cope.

Planning and taking immediate action to meet the urgent needs and requirements of the client is done "always, on a daily basis" by 66,5% of the employees of the department and "always but not daily" by 27,4%. Only 5,6% of respondents said „not always because they are already large“ and 0,5% "because I do not have enough time".

To the question „Do you follow the changes in the normative documents related to your work“ were given prevailing positive answers with 46,1% being informed once a week and 37,7% once a month. The remaining 13,0% rely on managers to inform, and 3,3% relied on colleagues' competence. Three employees have not listed any of the suggested answers.

50,7% of respondents in the department deal with ethical dilemmas and conflicts at work and manage their workload because they have the knowledge, techniques and experience to do so. Serious difficulties, however, are experienced by 44,4% of social workers and only 0,8% can not cope because they have no knowledge and techniques to do so. Five staff members did not respond.

The question of whether the job requires continual improvement of qualification was given answers by 56,0% with “once every 6 months”. 36,1% said „once a year“. 6,4% said there was no need to improve the qualification, „because there are not many changes“, and „it is superfluous“ have indicated 1,5%. Fourteen of the study participants did not respond to the question presented in Table 8.

Professional contacts with colleagues inside and outside the organization are supported by 95,8% of department employees, 37,8% of them doing daily, and the remaining 58,0% not constantly. 3,5% of respondents rely on managers to guide their work, and 0,7% said they did not maintain such contacts „because it is superfluous“ and „because there is no time“. Only five employees did not answer this question.

The open question of what are the reasons for the difficulties in implementing the activities in social work as a whole were given answers covering problems of 20 areas. Firstly, 20,2% of respondents indicated lack of equipment and supplies at work. Secondly, by 9,6% high workload and a large volume of work cases were highlighted. Third, 7,0% reported the lack of adequate facilities and poor working conditions. Fourth, 5,1% pointed the lack of consumer support. Fifth place with 4,4% is the lack of organized transport and remoteness in the workplace to the clients. Interesting is the fact that all 767 social workers from the Child Protection Departments have answered this question.

Table 8. Requirements for improvement of qualification

Regarding the acquirement of professional duties and their fulfillmentwithout problems 42,2% of the respondents reported „over 4 weeks“ and 22,9% „up to 4 weeks“. 16,0% still have a performance problem. 19 employees could not judge and answer this question. The data are presented in Table 9.

On the question „Do you e make a difference between various theories, policies, procedures and methods of intervention“, 757% of respondents in the departments do not encounter any difficulties, while 20,9% deal but have serious difficulties. 3,3% employees can not handle and rely on help from colleagues. Seven social workers did not responded to this question, as evidenced by Table 10.

Table 9. Acquiring professional skills when starting work

Table 10. Knowledge on different theories, policies, procedures and methods of intervention

When working with people in different problematic situations 89,0% of the employees are using an analysis of the consequences of social inequality, discrimination and social exclusion. Serious difficulties were marked by 9,3%. On help from colleagues rely 1,4% of surveyed social workers. Only three employees of the Child Protection Department did not answer this question. The information is presented in Table 11.

Table 11. Analyzing the implications of social inequality

Table 12. Prejudices to clients

Table 13. Satisfaction with work

Table 14. Expectations from the profession of social worker

Table 15. Opportunities to work in another professional sphere

Considering overcoming the prejudices to the clients in the social work 94,4% of the employees in the departments deal. Depending on other factors such as momentary mood, colleagues, the client 5,6% of the respondents work. Only four employees did not answer the question (Table 12).

Only 41,3% of social workers are satisfied with their work, and 54,1% in part account for this. Unsatisfied are 4,4% of department employees. Two employees did not answer (Table 13).

It is interesting that the expectations for the profession of social worker have fully justified by 31,8% of the employees of the Child Protection Departments, in part – 57,3%, while the answer "no" was indicated by 10,9% of the respondents. Thirteen employees did not respond, as evidenced by Table. 14.

To the question „If you are given the opportunity to work in another sphere, would you leave the social one“ the answer „Definetly yes“ was given by 18,6%. The hesitation is 57,0%, and „definitely not“ was mentioned by 24,4% of the surveyed social workers. Thirteen did not answer the question. The data are presented in Table 15.

When answering the question „When starting in the department did you receive an introductory training” 46,5% of the employees in the departments responded categorically „yes“. 23,1% have received introductory training „in part“ and 30,4% have not been introduced through training at work. Eight social workers did not answer this question.

29,9% of social workers were involved in trainings organized by the agency, 24,8% - in part, and 45,3% were not involved in training. 1,8% of respondents did not want to answer.

On the question of what kind of trainings as an organizational form the employees of the Child Protection Departments need, with the possibility to indicate a combination of several types, 43,6% of the respondents pointed to the necessity of specialized training with practical orientation, 28,4% of them prefer participating in a dedicated forum to transfer good practices. 14,3% defined their need for a narrow specialized talk, seminar, and 7,0% prefer distance learning. All respondents answered this question as 59,4% of the social workers in the departments gave more than one answer.

On the question about the time for the trainings in which the respondents would be involved 52,1% said that it should be done at work and with almost equal percentages 16,0% and 16,5% were employees who prefer training to take place after working hours of up to 2 hours, or during the the weekends for one day. 8,8% of respondents are willing to spend several days of paid annual leave to take part in upgrading training, and 6,6% of the surveyed social workers were for both days in the weekends.

On the question of the place of the trainings in which respondents would take place 47,0% of the surveyed employees prefer trainings held in the same location where they work. 30,4% tend to travel and join training in another location, and 22,7% prefer workplace training. 80,1% of the respondents gave one answer and the other 19,9% gave two answers.

On the question of the optimal duration of the training that the respondents would participate 48,1% indicated that it should be within 3 days, and 29,4% said they could spend up to 10 days (in modules) to participate in training to improve their professional qualification. Only 14,9% said they would have the opportunity to participate in training that lasts up to 1 day. For longer (more than 1 month) module training 7,7% of employees in the departments were identified.

To the question of what to emphasize in the organization of the upgrading trainings answers were given to all proposed in the survey. First of all, 50,5% of the respondents have indicated that the lecturers should be qualified and competent, well prepared, familiar with the problems of social workers and offering quality training. Secondly, 28,8% focused on the choice of detailed materials to be used during and after the training. Next, 15,2% of employees rely on training, organized and provided with the agency’s resources, and 5,4% of respondents prefer trainings to be run by university lecturers.

On the question of what would help for career and career development of social workers, respondents answered as follows:

  • Participation in specialized training - a positive answer by 29,7%;
  • Sharing good practice – 29,2% gave a positive response;
  • Exchange of information with other colleagues in the country -13,6% answered this question;
  • Obtaining specialized literature – 11,7% of the respondents gave an affirmative answer;
  • Providing an expert solution to a problem – 11,7% of respondents gave a response that is of great importance to social workers;
  • Access to models of internal administrative documents - 4,1% have given a positive answer.

In 15 different areas respondents answered to the question of areas of their work in which social workers are in need of additional training (Table 16).

Table 16. Topics of additional training

In the first place, 22,2% of all respondents, regardless of their professional experience, responded that special training on "Competencies and skills to work in critical situations, tensions and stress" should be organized. This gives the reason to assert that social work is extremely psychological and stressful. This is confirmed by the answers to the next question to which 10,8% responded that they would engage in training on „Competence in direct work with clients“. The social worker looks for opportunities to acquire new knowledge, skills and techniques for dealing with consumers. Thirdly, 8,4% of respondents indicated training on „Competence to perform social diagnostics“. The third place with 8,3% is for the identified training on „Skills for analyzing, social forecasting and planning“ due to the close result that the respondents have indicated. Fourth, 7,6% of the respondents reported training on „Competence for decision-making“.

On the question of prioritizing the main themes of introductory training for new social workers, respondents were asked to indicate one or a combination of several of the following preformulated topics:

  • Social policy and legal framework in the field of child protection;
  • Team management, teamwork and communications in social work;
  • Organizational behavior in social work;
  • Social work with children and families at risk;
  • Organization and specificity of the activities carried out in the department;
  • The process of deinstitutionalization - social policies;
  • Fundamentals and methods in the work of the social worker.

The most important thing is the topic of social work with children and families at risk with 69,0%. Secondly, 35,6% of the votes included the topic Social policy and the legal framework in the field of child protection, and thirdly 31,5% the topic of fundamentals and methods in the work of the social worker in the social welfare sector. As the most insignificant topic at the time of the survey, 13.3% of respondents indicated the training in organizational behavior in the social work. The prioritization of all proposed topics for further training is presented in Table 17. Social workers have given more than one answer, so the number of answers is larger than the number of respondents.

Respondents from the Child Protection Departments were asked to identify their preference for participating in upgrading trainings. Sixteen of the the topics were predefined, and the respondents could indicate one answer or a combination of several. The following results were obtained, the responses being ranked downwards according to the percentage of positive responses as shown in Table 18.

Table 17. Topics of introductory training

Table 18. Topics of advanced training

The results show that at the first plaale with 55,1% was identified the topic of training methods for child victims of violence and their families. Secondly, the topic „Methods for case management of child at risk“ – 38,0%, third – „Methods for early diagnosis of risk of child abandonment and prevention of abandonment” - 37,7%. On the fourth place is „Foster care - alternative form for raising children in family environment - process and specifics”- 36,4% ", and fifth – „Working with children - victims of trafficking and trafficking and their families”- 34,4%. The themes of all five of the first upgrading trainings are highly specialized, generating constant dynamics in terms of regulation and communication with the client.

In the questionnaire, a question was asked as to what supervision the employees of the Child Protection Department need. Respondents were offered 11 responses. The aim was to gather information on the need and to identify the need for the type and reasons for conducting supervision in the near future. This would make it possible for the agency, and in particular the child protection teams, to better plan and organize the supervisions. The responses received cover topics from 11 different areas, most of which were not repeated and only concern the individual interviewee. After the analysis of the results, however, several types of supervision were highlighted, for which the respondents feel that they need to change from the current way or plan to carry out. The results are presented in Table 19.

Table 19. Supervision

The results show that, first of all, 19,57% identified the need for supervision to overcome occupational stress and the professional "burn out" syndrome. Secondly, with 15,57%, there is a need for supervision to social workers to understand their skills and strengths and weaknesses. Third, by 14,07% supervision is needed to comment on the practice of different social methods. The goals of all three are highly specialized, generating constant dynamics in terms of client communication, specialized institutions and administrative work.

CONCLUSION

The survey shows that the employees of the two departments Child Protection and People with Disabilities and Social Services in the Social Assistance Directorates are actively involved in trainings and seminars and have attitudes to increase their professional qualifications organized by the Social Assistance Agency in order to increase professional experience and knowledge, to exchange experience and good practices between colleagues and departments. This is particularly important for social workers who have a professional experience of less than two years and who, for one reason or another, have not been inducluded in introductory training, as well as in places where due to a shortage of experts in departments workloads, number of cases and many different obligations increase [46-71].

Changes in the legal framework lead to the attitude of rapid and adequate organizational measures for conducting advanced trainings to update and expand knowledge in areas covered by changes. This is a problem that directly affects the daily work of the social workers. Providing timely and adequate information on these changes, organizing timely training as well as variants of ready-made models of internal regulations will save time for social workers, will help to unify the internal regulations of the departments and, last but not least, would help to generate a good working climate in the departments and hence the agency as a whole.

Employees of the Child Protection and Disability and Social Services Departments at the Social Assistance Directorate state that they need training and qualification for various professional problems and express their need for exchange of professional experience and good practices. It would be a good practice to organize roundtables, discussion forums, meetings, etc., and when necessary to discuss and solve current problems of social workers in different regions and locations, a preferred form for further qualification. On the basis of the results of the already identified trainings, a training plan could be drawn up for the years in the near future. Pre-planning will allow for greater efficiency in organizing trainings [71-95].

REFERENCES

  1. Terziev, V., Vazdeystvie na politikite na pazara na truda za osiguryavane na zaetost“, „Dema pres - Ruse“, 2013
  2. Terziev, V. (2016). Obuchenie, osnovano na kompetentsii, v publichnite sluzhbi za zaetost (Competence-based training in public employment services), Tenth International Scientific Conference “The Power of Knowledge”, 7-9 October 2016, Agia Triada, Republic of Greece. Knowledge International Journal Scientific papers Vol. 14.1, pp. 33-48.
  3. Terziev, V., Dimitrova, S., Arabska, E. (2015). Razrabotvane na kompetentsii, pregled na potentsiala na sluzhitelite i opredelyane potrebnostite ot vavezhdashto i poddarzhashto obuchenie v publichnite sluzhbi za zaetost. Natsionalna konferentsiya s mezhdunarodno uchastie „Obrazovatelni tehnologii 2015“, Kavarna, 6-8 septemvri 2015 g. Izvestiya na Sayuza na uchenite – Sliven, str. 70-79.
  4. Terziev, V. (2009). Intercompany training as a technology for company management staff development. Proceedings of the International Conference on Manufacturing Systems ICMaS, Bucharest, Romania 5-6 November 2009. Vol.4, pp. 389-392.
  5. Terz Terziev, V., Dimitrova, S. (2014). The internal training as a process of continuous training, Mezhdunarodnaya nauchno-prakticheskaya konferentsiya 25 sentyabrya 2014, „Innovatsionnayy vektor razvitiya nauki”, Ufa, Rossiya, рр. 222-231.
  6. Terziev, V. (2017). Model of methodology for determining the needs of continuing vocational training of social work specialists providing social services. Evraziyskiy soyuz uchenayh (ESU), Ezhemesyachnayy nauchnayy zhurnal № 1(34) / 2017, part 2, pp. 55-78.
  7. Терзиев. В., Social and economic policies in a period of active transformations in Bulgaria, Book of Abstracts: First International Scientific Conference „Sustainability Challenges in Modern Organizations - Knowledge & Innovation in Management & Operation“, ISBN 978-619-7246-03-2 (DVD), ISBN 978-619-7246-05-6 (e-book), p. 10.
  8. Терзиев. В., С. Станчев, Development of active social policies in Bulgaria, Book of Abstracts: First International Scientific Conference „Sustainability Challenges in Modern Organizations - Knowledge & Innovation in Management & Operation“, ISBN 978-619-7246-03-2 (DVD), ISBN 978-619-7246-05-6 (e-book), p. 38
  9. Терзиев. В., Е. Арабска, Состояние рынка труда в Болгарии, VII international scientific and applicative conference KNOWLEDGE WITHOUT BORDERS, 8-10 април 2016 г., Банско, България. International Journal Scientific papers Vol. 12.2, ISSN1857-92, рр.221-236.
  10. Терзиев. В., Е. Арабска, Функционирование общественных служб занятости в перспективе 2020, VII international scientific and applicative conference KNOWLEDGE WITHOUT BORDERS, 8-10 април 2016г., Банско, България. International Journal Scientific papers Vol. 12.2, ISSN1857-92, стр.41-50.
  11. Терзиев. В., Е. Арабска, С. Филипов, С. Станчев, Индикатори за мониторинг на активната политика на пазара на труда в България. XI Международной научной конференции „Инновации в технологиях и образовании“, Кузбасский государственный технический университет им. Т.Ф. Горбачева, Беловo, 18-19 марта 2016 г. Часть 4, ISBN 978-5-906888-04-4, с.261-267.
  12. Терзиев. В., Е. Арабска, С. Филипов, С. Станчев, Реализация на програми и мерки на активната политика на пазара на труда в България. XI Международной научной конференции „Инновации в технологиях и образовании“, Кузбасский государственный технический университет им. Т.Ф. Горбачева, Беловo, 18-19 марта 2016 г. Часть 4, ISBN 978-5-906888-04-4, с.290-304.
  13. Терзиев. В., Е. Арабска, С. Филипов, С. Станчев, Политики за изграждане на функциониращ пазар на труда в България и въздействия върху уязвимите групи. XI Международной научной конференции „Инновации в технологиях и образовании“, Кузбасский государственный технический университет им. Т.Ф. Горбачева, Беловo, 18-19 марта 2016 г. Часть 4, ISBN 978-5-906888-04-4, с.268-276.
  14. Терзиев. В., Е. Арабска, С. Филипов, С. Станчев, Предизвикателства пред развитието на пазара на труда и ролята на публичните служби по заетостта. XI Международной научной конференции „Инновации в технологиях и образовании“, Кузбасский государственный технический университет им. Т.Ф. Горбачева, Беловo, 18-19 марта 2016 г. Часть 4, ISBN 978-5-906888-04-4, с. 277-289.
  15. Терзиев. В., Е. Арабска, Влияние на активната политика и посреднически услуги по заетостта в България. Четиринадесета младежка научно-практическа конференция, 19-20 април 2016 г. Федерация на научно-техническите съюзи, София. Сборник доклади, ISSN 1314-8931, стр.229-238.
  16. Терзиев. В., Е. Арабска, Основни профили на безработните лица в България. Четиринадесета младежка научно-практическа конференция, 19-20 април 2016г. Федерация на научно-техническите съюзи, София. Сборник доклади, ISSN 1314-8931, стр.198-205.
  17. Терзиев. В., Е. Арабска, Динамика в уязвимите групи на пазара на труда в България. Четиринадесета младежка научно-практическа конференция, 19-20 април 2016г. Федерация на научно-техническите съюзи, София. Сборник доклади, ISSN 1314-8931, стр.206-217.
  18. Терзиев. В., Е. Арабска, Тенденции на пазара на труда и търсенето на работна сила в България. Четиринадесета младежка научно-практическа конференция, 19-20 април 2016г. Федерация на научно-техническите съюзи, София. Сборник доклади, ISSN 1314-8931, стр.218-228.
  19. Терзиев. В., Е. Стоянов, Социальная программа, как продукт социального программирования. Закономерности и тенденции развития науки в современном обществе. Сборник статей Международной научно-практической конференции, 15 марта 2016г. НИЦ АЭТЕРНА, ISBN 978-5-906849-64-9 Ч, с.158-164.
  20. Терзиев. В., Е. Стоянов, Социальная активность человеческого ресурса - основа эффективной социальной политики. Проблемы, перспективы и направления инновационного развития науки. Сборник статей Международной научно-практической конференции, 20 марта 2016г. НИЦ АЭТЕРНА, ISBN 978-5-906849-72-4, с.136-142.
  21. Терзиев. В., Е. Стоянов, Стратегические преимущества активной социалньй программы. Проблемы, перспективы и направления инновационного развития науки. Сборник статей Международной научно-практической конференции, 20 марта 2016г. НИЦ АЭТЕРНА, ISBN 978-5-906849-72-4, с.142-150.
  22. Терзиев. В., Е. Стоянов, Социальная эффективность как мера деятельности в социуме. Международный научный журнал Инновационная наука, N 3/2016, АЭТЕРНА, ISSN 2410-6070, с.225-234.
  23. Terziev. V., N. Bencheva, T. Stoeva, E. Arabska. State of social entrepreneurship in Bulgaria and Europe. Международна бизнес конференция Наука и бизнес за интелигентно бъдеще, Варненски свободен университет 10-11 юни 2016 г. Варна, България, рр.55-62.
  24. Terziev. V., N. Bencheva, T. Stoeva, E. Arabska, Social enterprises in Bulgaria. Международная научно-практическая конференция „Перспективы развития науки и образования“, Научный журнал „Экономика и Финансы“ Пловдив, България, 27 юни 2016г. ISBN 978-617-7214-28-0, с.63 74.
  25. Terziev. V., N. Bencheva, E. Arabska, Implications on development of social economy in Bulgaria, Международная научно-практическая конференция „Перспективы развития науки и образования“, Научный журнал „Экономика и Финансы“ Пловдив, България, 27 юни 2016г. ISBN 978-617-7214-28-0, с.55-63.
  26. Terziev. V., N. Bencheva, M. Tepavicharova, E. Arabska, Encouragement of social entrepreneurship in Bulgaria. Международная научно-практическая конференция „Перспективы развития науки и образования“, Научный журнал „Экономика и Финансы“ Пловдив, България, 27 юни 2016г. ISBN 978-617-7214-28-0, с.45-55.
  27. Terziev. V., E. Arabska, Impact of social enterprises, Международна научна конференция. Изложение на съвременни отбранителни продукти, 6–7 октомври, 2016г. Национален военен университет „Васил Левски“, Факултет „Артилерия, ПВО и КИС“ – гр.Шумен, Военна техническа академия, гр.Букурещ, Румъния, Национален университет по отбрана, гр.Варшава, Полша. ISSN 2367-7902, pp.391-400.
  28. Terziev. V., E. Arabska, Social enterprises and social entrepreuners. - Международна научна конференция. Изложение на съвременни отбранителни продукти, 6–7 октомври, 2016г. Национален Военен Университет „Васил Левски“, Факултет „Артилерия, ПВО и КИС“ – гр.Шумен, Военна техническа академия, гр.Букурещ, Румъния, Национален университет по отбрана, гр.Варшава, Полша. ISSN 2367-7902, pp.409-416.
  29. Terziev. V., Arabska, E. Social entrepreneurship in Еurope, Международна научна конференция. Изложение на съвременни отбранителни продукти, 6–7 октомври, 2016г. Национален Военен Университет „Васил Левски“, Факултет „Артилерия, ПВО и КИС“ – гр.Шумен, Военна техническа академия, гр.Букурещ, Румъния, Национален университет по отбрана, гр.Варшава, Полша, ISSN 2367-7902, pp.401-408.
  30. Терзиев. В., Развитие на пазара на труда в България и влияние на провежданите политики в областта на заетостта и безработицата, Списание „Икономика 21“, СА „Д.А. Ценов“ – Свищов, Година VI, книга 2,2016, ISSN 1314-3123 (Print), ISSN 2534-9457 (Online), стр.23-64.
  31. Терзиев. В., П. Димитрова, Развитие системы социальной поддержки в Болгарии, Сборник статей Международной научно-практической конференции „Актуальные проблемы современной науки“, „Аэтерна“ (Уфа) 2014, ISBN: 978-5-906769-47-3, с.281-293.
  32. Терзиев. В., П. Димитрова, Развитие структуры системы социальной поддержки Болгарии, Сборник статей Международной научно-практической конференции „Актуальные проблемы современной науки“, „Аэтерна“ (Уфа) 2014, ISBN: 978-5-906769-47-3, с.294-307.
  33. Terziev. V., E. Arabska, Social Policy Development and Implementation: Municipal level perspectives, HASSACC 2016 - Human and Social Sciences at the Common Conference, October 3-7, 2016.ISBN 978-80-554-1270-2, eISSN 2453-6075, cdISSN 1339-522X, pp.19-24.
  34. Terziev. V., Social policies on labor market as theory and practice in Bulgaria, Международна научна конференция „Икономическо благосъстояние чрез споделяне на знания“, посветена на 80-годишнината от основаването на Стопанска академия „Д. А. Ценов“ – Свищов, 9 и 10 ноември 2016 г. Том 1 ,ISBN 978-954-23-1185-0, стр.47-63.
  35. Terziev. V., E. Stoyanov, E. Arabska, Monitoring of active social policies on labor market: the case of Bulgaria. Business Economics, ISSN 0007 - 666X, Palgrave Macmillan Ltd., N 4(51)/ 2016.
  36. Dimitrovski. R., V. Terziev, S. Saliu, L. Pushova, Managing the problem of unemployment in the republic of Macedonia, Tenth International Scientific Conference THE POWER OF KNOWLEDGE, 7-9 October 2016, Agia Triada, Republic of Greece. Knowledge International Journal Scientific papers Vol. 14.3, ISSN 1857-92, pp.879-884.
  37. Terziev. V., Development of labour market in Bulgaria and impact of policies on employment and unemployment. Стопанска академия „Д. А. Ценов“ – Свищов, сп. „Икономика 21“ , брой 2. ISSN 1314-3123.
  38. Terziev. V., E. Arabska, R. Dimitrovski, L. Pushova, Challenges to social entrepreneurship development in Bulgaria, Conference Bansko 2016g. Eleventh International Conference: KNOWLEDGE CAPITAL OF THE FUTURE, December, 16-18. 2016 Bansko Bulgaria, KNOWLEDGE International Journal Scientific Papers Vol.15.2, ISSN 1857-92.
  39. Terziev. V., Социалното предприемачество в България и Европа (Social entrepreneurship in Bulgaria and Europe), International Scientific conference,29 September 2016, Plovdiv, Bulgaria, Международна научна конференция по социално предприемачество-Аграрен университет Пловдив), ISBN 978-954-517-249-6, ISBN 978-954-517-250-2, pp.11-18.
  40. Terziev. V., E. Arabska, Потребности и предизвикателства пред социалните предприемачи (Needs and challenges of social entrepreneurs), International Scientific conference, 29 September 2016, Plovdiv, Bulgaria, (, Международна научна конференция по социално предприемачество-Аграрен университет Пловдив), ISBN 978-954-517-249-6, ISBN 978-954-517-250-2, pp.51-60.
  41. Terziev. V., Impacts of active social programs on labor market. The X International Academic Congress „Contrmporary Science and Education in Americas, Africa and Eurasia”, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 19-21 November 2016.Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP): 3.675, SCImago Journalk Rank (SJR): 3.926, ISBN 978-6-376-43475-8, pp.100-113.
  42. Terziev. V., Management of the effective social programming or the controlled beginning of the good future, European Review of Economic Hitory, №1 (21) 2017, ISSN 1361-4916. рр.928-935.
  43. Terziev. V., E. Arabska, Providing business support to social entrepreneurs, Children & Schools, Issue 4 (2), (October), Volume 39. Oxford University Press, 2017, ISSN 1532-8759, pp.1151-1159.
  44. Terziev. V., N. Nichev, S. Simeonov, Historical development and characteristics of pension systems, Review of Finance, Issue 6 (2), (October), Volume 21. Oxford Universty, pp. 1321-1338.
  45. Terziev. V., E. Arabska, Examining social enterprise business advisors job profiles and qualifications, Review of Finance, Issue 6 (2), (October), Volume 21. Oxford University Press, 2017, ISSN 1572-3097, pp.1339-1355.
  46. Terziev. V., Development of the social assistance system’s structure in Bulgaria, Past & Present, Issue 1 (2), (November), Volume 237. Oxford University Press, 2017, ISSN 0031-2746, pp.1087-1106.
  47. Terziev. V., Development of the social assistance system in Bulgaria, Past & Present, Issue 1 (2), (November), Volume 237. Oxford University Press, 2017, ISSN 0031-2746, pp. 1107-1125.
  48. Terziev. V., Impact of the labor market policies for ensuring employment, Journal of Economic Geography, Issue 6 (2), (November), Volume 17., ISSN 1468-2702, pp.1400-1410.
  49. Terziev. V., Building a model of social and pshychological adaptation, The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, Issue 6 (2), (December), Volume 42. Oxford University Press,2017, ISSN 0360-5310, pp.1318-1329.
  50. Terziev. V., Factors affecting the process of social adaptation, European Journal of International Law, №1(28) 2017, ISSN 0938-5428. pp. 923-935, рp.923-935.
  51. Terziev. V., Importance of human resources to social development, Oxford Journal of Legal studies, Issue 4 (2), Volume 37. Oxford University Press, 2017, ISSN 0143-6503, pp.933-939.